Finally Over (Rant)
Well folks, Peter
Jackson’s Hobbit
"trilogy" had come to an end.
I wish that I could say that it ended on a high note but that would be
lying. This series was so disappointing that I was looking forward for it to
end. Now that it has ended, Jackson enthusiasts everywhere now know what it was
like for us Star Wars fans to be given such a crappy set of prequels. The
argument of who has a better trilogy is now at a standstill, for both Jackson
and George
Lucas couldn't live up to their fans' expectations.
What bothers me the most about this "trilogy" is
that Jackson had help on the story outside of his award winning Lord of the Rings writing team. Guillermo del Toro help lay the grounds
work for what was supposed to be only a two film outing. Was what del Toro
wrote really that bad and how much of what del Toro wrote really is in the
final product? The other thing that bothers me is, why did this need to be made
into three films? I have ranted about this before and here I am a year later no
closer to the answer. I guess the only real thing I can thank Jackson for is
that this trilogy doesn't have four different endings.
I will admit that I didn't hate the movie. I thought that Martin Freeman played a very good Bilbo. Freeman, to me, has always had a skittish quality on screen
and made the perfect Hobbit. I also enjoy some of the additional scenes
evolving Gandalf (Sir Ian McKellen) and Galadriel (Cate Blanchett). These scenes really show off Galadriel's
power, unlike her scenes in Rings. Of course Smaug was awesome to
look at again, but his time is short
lived and which leads me to more of my disappointments.
As beautiful ( as a dragon can be) as Smaug is to look
at, his screen time is about 10 minutes.
Jackson and company (Rings fans as
well) built up the hype of his arrival,
but the end result was very lackluster. In Desolation of Smaug, Smaug is presented as this elegant figure who
justifies taking the dwarven treasure as almost a favor to the dwarves. In this
film he becomes a bully to the humans of Lake-Town for giving the dwarves refuge.
This wouldn't have bothered me so much (it does happen in the book) if the latter
happened in Desolation. What was the
purpose of splitting up this scene? Show Smaug in one film especially if you
are going to only show him for all of 10 minutes of another film.
Some of my aggravations come with too many spoilers so I
will only ruin a small part of the ending to Battle. *Star of spoilers*
Toward the end of the film, Legolas (Orlando Bloom Lord of the
Rings) becomes resentful of his father's, Elven King Thranduil ( Lee
Pace Guardians of the Galaxy),
actions during the battle and decides to leave the royal guard. Thranduil
accepts this (quite gracefully I might add) and suggests that his son seek out
a Ranger from the North. For fans of the Rings
films, this is an obvious reference to Aragorn ( Viggo Mortensen from the Lord
of the Rings trilogy), but this comes to question Jacksons real knowledge
of the books. During the time of The Hobbit, Aragorn would have been 10. Now talking the
books or if it, what about the fact that
in Fellowship of the Ring, Legolas
arrives as part of the Elven representative for Mirkwood...HIS FATHER'S
KINGDOM!. Legolas' departure just raises more questions than answers.
The other discrepancy I want to address is Taruiel (Evangeline Lily Lost).
Why do we have her? I understand that she was created specifically for this
trilogy, but in the grand scheme of things Taruiel serves no real purpose.
Taruiel had some spectacular action scenes in Desolation, yet here in the
concluding chapter, she becomes almost
nonexistent. She also survives the film,
which again raises more questions. Like...where the heck was she during Rings? Or did she die somewhere in the
60 years between events? This just goes
to show, like Lucas, Jackson didn't
watch his own trilogy. *End of Spoilers*
Like I said before I didn't hate this film, it was the best
out of this trilogy, but it didn't live
up to the same standards as Lord of the
Rings. This trilogy as a whole just felt confused. Not that I was confused,
but the film felt confused about what was going on. Jackson emphasized some
major points of the books, but that emphasis was overshadowed by time spent
away from the source material.
The Verdict: Check
Out On Blu-Ray
Comments
Post a Comment